planet
To quantify what sustainability means, LCF Fashion Business School has identified four distinct yet interlinked pillars; Planet, People, Profit and Purpose. The environmental pillar, Planet, assesses how consumers treat the earth’s resources and ecosystems. Humankind has been known to have two innate desires; sufficiency and longevity (Singh 2017) consequently causing conflict between how one treats the planet and how the planet should be treated. This builds upon the 1987 Brundtland Report defining sustainability as, ‘meeting the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs’. This definition is renowned, yet it fails due to a lack of a perfect example of how to achieve this model of sustainability. Brundtland’s broad definition of “needs” is subjective to one’s standard of living (Kashani et al, 2021) and fails to account for the disparity between first and third-world countries. Undoubtedly, this created confusion about how individual consumers are able to achieve sustainability, shifting responsibility onto larger corporations to create change. To challenge this belief system, consumers should become accustomed to the United Nations 17 Sustainable Development Goals developed in 2015. The SDG’s are a policy framework calling for action to end, ‘poverty, protect the planet, and ensure that by 2030 all people enjoy peace and prosperity,’ (United Nations 2015). Sustainable development is the only viable path for humanity (Sachs, 2012) meaning it has become increasingly urgent for these SDGs to achieve success. In relation to how the fashion industry can become more sustainable, one goal, in particular, stands out – this being Responsible Consumption and Production. Promisingly, conscious consumerism is thriving with 62% of millennials claiming they are conscious about purchasing from local, sustainable or ethically sourced brands, (Mullen, 2021). Millennials are tasked with confronting the impacts of environmental degradation, providing hope for genuine consumer progress towards sustainability and the planet. On the other hand, fast fashion has progressively become more popular, thriving on the idea of more for less (Bick et al, 2018)
.Fig 2. Clothing in landfill (Spring, 2017)
Consequently, this encourages the mass production of low-quality, cheap resale-value clothing which is detrimental to the environment. Increased consumer demand means brands are producing almost twice the amount of clothing today compared to before 2000 (Kirsi Niinimäki et al 2020). Countries need to actively adopt a circular economy, a model of production and consumerism emphasising reusability. Fig 1, Circular Economy (Cohen 2022)
A circular business model leads to less demand, production and consumption paving the way for a more sustainable planet.
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
Rachel Bick et al (2018):The global environmental injustice of fast fashion
Naomi Cohen (2022):Making the Linear Circular: a short guide to the circular economy
Mohammadhadi Hajian et al (2021): Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals
Caitlin Mullen (2021):Nearly 6 in 10 consider themselves conscious consumers
Kirsi Niinimäki et al (2020): The environmental price of fast fashion
Jeffrey Sachs (2012):From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals
Tej Vir Singh (2017): Is our planet in peril? The imperative of sustainability, Tourism Recreation Research
Alexandra Spring (2017):Landfill becomes the latest fashion victim in Australia’s throwaway clothes culture